On 10/4/18 5:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > * who is going to do the work? > * do we have budget to do this? Yes, I think it would be fun to get > the community involved for ideas but I think also budget for a design > agency to take some of those ideas to a logo suitable for the next 15 > years would be awesome! See the Red Hat effort about the redesign for > shadow man for an example here (no further comment on that!) > * Without an effective marketing team how do we deal with that? > * Without an effective web team how do we deal with that? > This could be a good opportunity to reevaluate the relationship of different mindshare teams we already have in Fedora and how we can better support them in their work. Because we do have a design team, a marketing team, and a web team doing great work – so I am curious where the perception of effectiveness arises. :) I want to clarify my previous comment. I imagine everyone agrees it should be open and transparent, but we may define those differently. It should include engagement and active participation of mindshare teams in a process to update the logo. If the logo is refreshed without active involvement of these teams, whatever the final result is won't feel representative of our community—to me. If working with mindshare teams in this process feels tedious or that it would draw this process out over a long stretch of time, it's worth considering why that is and what we can do to make it not feel this way. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
