On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Radka Janekova <radka.janek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Radka Janekova <radka.janek@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > Please do not close private pagure tickets opened in order to discuss >> > something sensitive before the discussion is actually over - agreed that its >> > over by the person who opened it up, and others in the council. This kind of >> > decision can not be taken by a single person. >> >> Getting approval from the ticket reporter to close a ticket can lead >> to tickets being open forever that are not actively being worked. It >> is up to the group to determine when a ticket is closed, and sometimes >> that means the reporter does not agree with that resolution. A ticket >> can always be reopened if it was closed prematurely or new information >> causes it to be relevant again. > > > "The group" is not an individual, if we're talking about the most recent > issue. And a simple question if there is anything else to be discussed would > be welcome rather them immediate dismissal without any discussion > whatsoever. > >> >> >> > Closing such ticket means ending the discussion prematurely as nobody >> > will keep track of it anymore. >> >> That is correct, and in some cases that is the desired result. > > > So you decided that my important and time sensitive query was desired to be > dismissed or ignored? I was speaking in the general case, but in your specific case if you have more information that would cause the ticket to be relevant then please reopen. josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
