On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Who is "we" that "decided" to cancel the running elections? What were the > reasons for this "decision"? I object to this strongly. It doesn't look > like this "decision" was made through an open process as is the usual > Fedora way. I can't even find a Council ticket for this or a thread > in the council-discuss mailing list. "We" is the council -- we had a quick discussion on the private council list (which we normally reserve for sensitive things). I asked Jan to file a public ticket about it because I agree this should be a public discussion. It's a mess and we need to figure out how to reset it in a way that restores confidence. I had meant a ticket to discussion reseting everything, but in that conversation, everyone on the council who chimed in was in favor of restarting, so ... I guess I didn't communicate that clearly enough to Jan, for which I apologize. (There's a bunch of other stuff going on today and I was terse.) All of that said, I don't think there was any *malice* here -- just a series of unfortunately ad hoc decisions. I really do think resetting and doing it better and more clearly is the best way forward. > Last but not least, I wonder why all elections are being cancelled > instead of just FESCo. This was not explained, either. Because they were inconsistent too, and it's _really_ better to run them all at the same time. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
