On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:42:55AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> I would prefer the Pagure instead of getfedora.org as Pagure aims to > >> the same purpose as GitHub does. > >> getfedora.org is more a hub to download already done stuff, where > >> Pagure as well as GitHub is a collaborative space holding source > >> codes/repositories. > > > > True. My concern is that pagure.io isn't _just_ Fedora stuff or > > official Fedora Project, and the front page is a little intimidating > > and confusing. > > If we had all the Fedora stuff namespaced under a Fedora organization > in pagure.io, it might be easier. This would definitely work, however it creates an extra layer. I think a key challenge with Pagure today is that as Matthew pointed out, the front page is very intimidating. I also find the search to be very non-intuitive. The displays of repos i'm in/watching/etc. is also sorted in a way that isn't obvious to me and I find that private forks sometimes rank higher than their upstreams. I wonder if we could find people interested in cleaning up the interface a bit more as I know that Pingou and team are busy. I also wonder if fedora.pagure.io or pagure.fp.o wouldn't be a better home for Fedora specific stuff. regards, bex _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
