On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:30:38AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> We did this last year. It didn't really pan out well. Whether that's > >> because of the themes that were set or something else, I have no idea. > > For whatever reason, we basically got those themes by accident. I > No we didn't. Come on, that's trying to hand-wave away the lack of > buy-in we got on the themes. Oh, no, I mean the same thing you are saying. We didn't get them because people were super-enthusiastic about them, we got them because people were like, "sure, sounds good" — not a lot of buy-in, as you say. > They weren't bad. They were tied to existing Objectives. People just > didn't go with it. We did exactly what Brian is proposing and it > failed. We need to figure out why, not just do it again and hope it > works better. We've basically had this problem around the Objectives idea in general. I was expecting we'd have more than we could deal with and would have to choose, rather than the current state. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
