Re: IRC SIG needs external oversight

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 September 2016 at 12:20, Be <be0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Well, I guess it depends on how the council wants to move here.
>>
>> a) If changes are made via the existing irc support sig, the process
>> would be to file a ticket on their trac, discuss it at the next
>> meeting, vote on it the meeting after that.
>>
>
> Considering this has not resulted in meaningful change already, I don't see any good reason to believe it would this time. It has been weeks since the original incident that started this thread and still all that has changed is that some words were changed on a webpage. No meaningful action was taken.
>

Please define what you mean by  "meaningful action" because it is not
self-evident and it is better to be clear at the beginning of what is
wanted versus ending up where everyone feels the other side is being
passive aggressive to each other.

>> b) if the council wants to just completely reorg things I suppose they
>> would want a council ticket with particulars and meet and discuss it
>> and then take whatever action they wish. Hopefully existing folks in
>> the irc support sig and other interested parties would participate in
>> the reorg as they wish.
>>
>> kevin
>
> Council ticket filed:
> https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/71
> _______________________________________________
> council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux