On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:08:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > We need to revisit why it ultimately stalled then. I think Matthew's > plans on documentation and purpose will help, but if it had traction > before and then fizzled out we need to avoid repeating that mistake > again. Before, it was going to be specifically an RPM repository with more relaxed packaging guidelines. That stalled because of the stuff Smooge said. With COPR as successful as it is, I don't think we really need that unified repository anyway. This incarnation is a lot more lightweight — it isn't a specific service or anything; it's a brand. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
