#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by pfrields): Replying to [comment:11 mattdm]: > > Again, this is why I feel like the labeling effectively solves the problem already. Perhaps "delineate" would be better here, but I understand you may not feel labeling is *enough* delineation. I would encourage some better language here, though, and that if you don't want to dictate implementation, don't. :-) > > Do you have a suggestion for alternate wording? I know you're not on the council, but anyone is free to help. :) What about: "The Council recognizes including select third-party non-free software in search results is a valid experiment to advance Fedora's mission. Search results should prioritize free and open source software, clearly specify that there is no endorsement, and offer links to Fedora-prepared educational information. Additionally, default configuration in Fedora Editions and Spins must not show non-free search results initially without an additional user interface action. This action need not be onerous, can be persistent, and the interface can indicate these non-free results are available upon action." Only slightly different, but I think it avoids a bit of potential bikeshedding and is easier to read. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:12> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
