#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+--------------------- Comment (by mattdm): Replying to [comment:10 pfrields]: > I think part 2 wording is confusing, for instance using "hide" where either you may not mean hide, or you specifically said you don't want to dictate implementation. I understand what you mean but the language is confusing. Just re-read and I'm not sure how to rephrase. Suggestions? I definitely _did_ mean "hide", and I don't think that's high level enough that I don't consider it an implementation detail. (_How_ they're hidden — now that is implementation.) > Again, this is why I feel like the labeling effectively solves the problem already. Perhaps "delineate" would be better here, but I understand you may not feel labeling is *enough* delineation. I would encourage some better language here, though, and that if you don't want to dictate implementation, don't. :-) Do you have a suggestion for alternate wording? I know you're not on the council, but anyone is free to help. :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:11> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
