Re: [council] #57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy
-------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  pfrields     |       Owner:
   Status:  new          |    Priority:  normal
Component:  General      |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  workstation  |
-------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by robyduck):

 ah, I only replied to the mail...pasting here again.

 Finally I've read this document, but I really have some concerns about
 third party software.
 I'm one of those users who believes in Fedora, because it has no third
 party software in it. It's all open source, that makes it different to
 other distributions, otherwise I could use plenty of other distros. And I
 think we should care about this value, and also about all the users who
 chose Fedora because it has this characteristic. Furthermore, it is very
 very easy nowadays to install third party software, and people (already)
 do that on their own risk because often it compromises the Fedora system.
 Even COPR is a third party repo, but it respects at least the Fedora
 guidelines, which other repos don't do.

 That said, I'm not against enabling a sort of shared installer which
 labels third party software, but it should not only label it but also pop
 up a warning that the end user is going to install software outside of the
 Fedora universe, and that this can in some cases compromise his system.
 People are used to click and don't think about what they are doing, so we
 should remember that clearly.
 I have also some concerns about replacing package formats, we should
 encourage community members to make Fedora packages, and not just allow
 upstream package formats. Like Matt I don't understand why we should
 prefer upstream packages, which very often care more about other
 distributions...let's prefer community member's packages.

 The document actually is still rather generic, if we want to allow third
 party software in some kind we need to write a very strict document about
 what we allow and what not. We can facilitate the use of third party
 software, but Fedora is free and should remain free and open source.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:7>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux