#60: Firefox: Don't increase fingerprint by adding "Fedora" to user agent -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: genodeftest | Owner: Status: new | Priority: minor Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by genodeftest): > Whether or not these plugins should be enabled or not is out of scope of what you are asking the council. Yes, sorry. I just wanted to show that they are not relevant any more since being barely used and not enabled by default (nothing about "should"). > Should Fedora packages and engineering default to a high level of privacy? Yes, of course. Privacy is a important requirement for an open society and democracy. > Who should define what "high level of privacy" means, and who should enforce it? I don't know. But isn't this about the firefox package? Or should it be more general? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/60#comment:8> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.