Re: strawman regional buget scenario

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/06/2016 10:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> Okay, so:
> 
>          Last           Regional         Best Guess
>         Official          FY17           at Actual
>          Budget         Request         FY16 Spending⁵
> 
> APAC     12650 (12.7%)   33025¹ (22.1%)     7600 (13.1%)
> EMEA     27000 (27.0%)   33250  (22.2%)    15000 (26.0%)
> LATAM    16500 (16.5%)   23180  (15.5%)    11000 (19.0%)
> NA       43850 (43.9%)   60000² (40.1%)    24200 (41.9%)
> 
> total   100000³         149455⁴            57800
> 
>   1. Based on totaling the wiki page
>   2. Wow
>   3. Remember, this year's budget excluded FADs, which is not something
>      we want to repeat; FADs were actually paid for from underspend
>   4. Yeah, that'd be nice....
>   5. This may not account for everything, but here's what we have from
>      internal records.
> 
> So, as a semi-arbitrary starting point, if we average the percentages
> from each of the categories, that gives us:
> 
> APAC:  17.3%
> EMEA:  24.5%
> LATAM: 16.5%
> NA:    41.7% 
> 
> If we give EMEA a 5 percentage-point "credit" for having a nice
> spreadsheet in early, that works out to:
> 
> APAC:  15.6%
> EMEA:  29.5%
> LATAM: 14.9%
> NA:    40.0%
> 
> If we allocate the $73500 in total regional funding, that looks like
> this (rounded slightly for prettiness):
> 
>            Adjusted     Percent of   Percent of
>              FY17       Asked for   Recorded FY16
>           Allocation      Amount      Spending
> 
> APAC:       $11500         34.8%        151.3%
> EMEA:       $21650         65.1%        144.3%
> LATAM:      $10950         47.2%         99.5%
> NA:         $29400         49.0%        121.5%
> 
> 
> Like I said, here's a starting point. What do you think?

In case the total regional funding is fixed, I think this allocation is
fair enough.
This is also a good starting point for next year budget planning (it is
much earlier from this year, in July!)

-- 
Rgds,
Tuan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux