Hi, I'll be on a train in the middle of nowhere tonight, so I won't be able to make it to the council meeting. Regarding the budget: For me, fF/hDI scenario sounds best, but frankly speaking I'm not happy with it either. It's not that I don't like the scenario, but the overall process. It's hard to vote on abstract scenarios without knowing what they actually mean for the people. We want to support some outreachy stuff, but do we actually have ideas how to spend 5k? What events do we attend? Who will attend these events? Ultimately, we want Fedora to be a flat hierarchy. Decisions-making should happen bottom-up and on the lowest possible level. Scenarios on the other hand seem very top-down. FAmSCo has been working hard to delegate as much responsibility down to the regions. This process has been working well and inspired people to participate. Therefor I suggest we first look at what they request, make some adjustments and once we know how much we need for regional support, we know how much is left for FADs and Outreachy. Best regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
