Il giorno mer, 21/10/2015 alle 13.03 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto: > Actually release download is a horrible counte and always has been. > It > is worse than no data at all because it is always incredibly overly > optimistic. Too many people set up (for i in true; do wget > http://getfedora.org > /dev/null) type things because they think it > helps us in some strange way. We have better numbers on post release > usage from dnf and other daily tools. Not perfect but probably within > an order of magnitude. [If we went by release iso download numbers it > would like some releases we should have hundreds of millions of > users. > That is clearly not the case in other traffic.] The dnf/yum numbers > are limited though because it only shows up in non-metered internet > places. Most of South America, Asia and large portions of Europe seem > to have metered connections and you instead end up with snapshots of > usage because it is too expensive to stay on the daily updates tree. > Not a way to follow IMO; because of things you are saying and also for the several variable could happen as well. [cut] > > > > I am working on getting statistics more out of the infrastructure > logs > so that they can be more visible than Matt's slides. It is my desire > to have a solution by Feb of next year. The main issues is that I am > wanting to make sure that I don't violate basic privacy concerns. > Then > it is also a small part of my job os progress comes in fits and > starts. > In my opinion this is a marketing strategy: starting. We can always have a more accurate tuning along the way. Thanks Gabri (mailga) _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
