Re: for discussion: Fedora OpenShift as an objective

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:10:04AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> OpenShift is based on kubernetes but because of the magic of golang,
> it's all statically linked at compile time. Therefore, OpenShift
> actually caries the entirety of kubernetes as a bundled library which

Uhm, how is the bundling related to the static linking performed by the
Go compiler? Those are orthogonal issues. We can build static binaries
from archives or source code (shipped as separate Fedora packages and
pulled in through BuildRequires) without doing any bundling at the SRPM
level.

> unfortunately means that the current inclusion and continued
> maintenance of kubernetes in Fedora isn't likely to mean much unless
> there's a guarantee that it will always match the specific version of
> kubernetes that OpenShift is based on for API compatibility and then

That seems to be the actual problem. The lack of any commitment to
maintain a stable API.
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux