On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > <snip good info> > > > I think this is something on the order of an Objective rather than > > just > > a change/feature proposal because it's actually a rather tall > > order. On > > the technical side, currently OpenShift can't be easily packaged > > because it includes some 200+ Go libraries, and we don't even have > > approved Go packaging guidelines. This probably means we'd be > > asking > > for a very large bundling exception (note 'Active upstream Security > > Team' as part of the justification). On the less technical but > > still > > important side, I'd like to see related marketing and > > documentation, > > and coordination with Fedora Atomic and the Fedora Cloud WG, and > > possibly with Fedora Server as well (I know OpenShift node as > > server > > role is already under some consideration). > > > > Thoughts, comments, thrown vegetables? > > Do you have someone in mind to lead this objective? If so, is there > a > reason they didn't propose this themselves? > I'm having a conversation about Fedora Server and OpenShift with Joe Brockmeier later this morning. I'll include this as a topic of conversation and see where it leads.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
