On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:55:25AM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > I think it was implicit that the Council/Board would honor Fedora > Legal's veto. The only reason I bring it up now is because we're > delegating it out to SIGs who may not be aware of that situation. Before we go too far, note that I was reading the linked policy without enough coffee and missed that this is really a "SIG gets things inline, council approves after" policy rather than a "council deligates the approval decision" policy -- line 3 still includes "submit to Council". So perhaps this is all moot. > If you'd rather have me put it in the Trademark_guidelines, I have no > issue with it being there, but I do want to make sure the SIGs are aware > of it. While I also can't imagine a real situation where the the council would disregard our own legal here, I think it's better for any veto power to be clearly documented rather than implicit. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
