On 05/07/2015 09:50 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: >>> We have a policy for possibly delegating trademark approval to various >>> SIGs. <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Trademark_approval_policy>. I'd >>> like to update "SIG" to read something like "SIG, Working Group, or >>> other Fedora committee or team". Any objections? >> >> I'd like there to be some sort of Fedora Legal veto in there. I don't >> anticipate ever having to use it, but I don't want anyone to think it >> doesn't exist. > > That seems basically reasonable. Wouldn't, however, that be a part of > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines>? It > actually does not seem to be; currently, that document says approval is > granted by the Council without any mention of a separate veto. I think it was implicit that the Council/Board would honor Fedora Legal's veto. The only reason I bring it up now is because we're delegating it out to SIGs who may not be aware of that situation. If you'd rather have me put it in the Trademark_guidelines, I have no issue with it being there, but I do want to make sure the SIGs are aware of it. ~tom == Red Hat _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
