> On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 8:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:07:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Given that the entire idea is to allow more time for planning, I >> personally think this is fine. Particularly when you take into >> consideration that FUDCons are regional events, I don't really see >> much objection to this at a Council level. The Ambassadors and >> organizers in those regions should be empowered to make their FUDCons >> as successful as possible. > > Yes, I agree too. True, couldn't agree more. @Matthew: Could that be considered as a go ahead from you as FPL? Because to proceed with with it, we need to open-up bids for the next FUDCon now, so that by June end we'll have confirmation about the next venue and we could make the due announcement during FUDCon APAC 2015. :) Thank you. --- Regards -Prasad http://feedmug.com _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss
