El 2014-09-10 09:49, Matthew Miller escribió:
Also, thinking kind of along those same lines, there's also the
category of
"fixed positions" — like the FPL role, and a possible new OSAS liaison
position (working with the ambassadors and user community and the
community
budget), and the example of a diversity chair we talked about at Flock
—
these should be merit based (because.... that's better!) but in some
cases
we might want to select them in a way other than soliciting
subcommunity
representatives.
I think this may be side-tracking the main topic. I am happy how FAmSCo
has evolved during the time that I have been an ambassador. It has
delegated a lot of budget decision making to the regions and
ambassadors. It has empowered people doing stuff. BUT this has turn out
that other teams whose members are not in ambassadors, are far away of
getting sponsored. Ambassadors have not proven to break the comfort
zone. I think we should work out some more project wide approach,
probably involving the outcome of the board changes.
Neville
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss
