Re: [board] #9: board vote on reorganization proposals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#9: board vote on reorganization proposals
---------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  mattdm   |       Owner:
   Status:  new      |    Priority:  normal
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |
---------------------+---------------------

Comment (by gholms):

 A:  -1
 B:  -1
 C:  +1

 Comments/recommendations:
  * Proposal A rests the project's high-level decisions solely upon the
 FPL's shoulders.  This introduces a project-wide point of failure (in the
 short term) that is particularly unfair to the FPL, who quite likely has
 his or her own goals within Fedora and a life outside of Fedora.  Whether
 based in reality or not, it also creates the appearance of a "good old
 boys" network.
  * Proposal B merely creates a new group to lead in place of the Board.
 It does nothing to encourage the other group, who still make decisions, to
 be active themselves.
  * Proposal C needs to explicitly mention that someone can say "-1" when
 he or she believes an unannounced change needs review.  Rollbacks are
 often not straightforward when one is not working with code.
  * Proposals A and C need more elaboration about who the groups' members
 will be to ensure reasonable representation and prevent needless obstacles
 to progress.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/9#comment:6>
board <https://fedorahosted.org/board>
Fedora Project Board Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux