On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:58:55AM -0700, inode0 wrote: > I don't like calling it the supreme court but if that really is the > model people want then having a single individual have veto power over > its decisions makes it not so supreme. "Supreme court" is just kind of a analogy I came up with and not meant to be a permanent label. If you've got a better name, I'd love to hear it. I think part of the current people are having is over different conceptions of what a "board" ought to do, so maybe better terminology will help. Terminology can't solve everything (what a world that would be!). My main concern here is blurred lines and a lot of possible back and forth as people are unclear where to go for what. If you've got some suggestions for making the delineation sharp, I think that would really help. > Like FESCo does now, any time the Council chooses to consult the board > it can. I would expect this to normally only happen when some Council > members are concerned about whether something being considered is > inconsistent with Fedora's core values. This comes back to sounding like "court" to me, although maybe there's something loaded in that term that doesn't sit right. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ board-discuss mailing list board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss
