On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:36:46AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: I'm afraid I'm not going to make the meeting this week - I'm at a conference right now. I've voted on the tickets. > 3. Does KDE Plasma product proposal meet these guidelines? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Plasma_Product > > Note that a) this is targetted at F22 and b) the proposed product mission > was modified slightly at the June 3rd KDE SIG meeting > (http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-06-03/kde-sig.2014-06-03-15.15.html) My current feeling is that the proposal does not sufficiently differentiate Plasma from Workstation. What makes Plasma fundamentally better for education and scientific users? Why would these applications not run equivalently well on Workstation? I'd much rather explore ways that we can allow differentiation outside the product process - the Ubuntu approach seems to have worked well here. The different Ubuntu desktops are built from the same archive but have independent (but related) brands and marketing. Why would this not work for us? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ board-discuss mailing list board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss
