On 04/01/2014 06:30 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
Sure, but considering that such a requirements list would include a lot
of look and feel, behavior, system service usage, developer API availability
and so on, it would in some cases require quite radical code changes in the
respective desktops.
And we could change the requirement in the Workstation for Qt5 to be available
to instead say 'there has to be an implementation of the Qt5 API available', which opens up
for people to write their own implementations, but I don't see it as a very realistic
thing for anyone to do or an especially worthwhile one.
There's arguably a problem with your hypothetical scenario.
Fedora already has > 1 standards-based Desktop implementations, but only
1 Qt5. And frankly, if some better Qt5 implementation came along, great
(but still unlikely, in agreement with you).
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
