----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 14:29 -0500, inode0 wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The KDE SIG would like public comment and feedback on a new Fedora.next > > > product proposal: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Plasma_Product > > > > > > mostly on the base proposal, Governance and PRD bits. Other stuff like > > > Technical spec are still undergoing polish. > > > > I went from pretty excited initially to a bit disappointed that the > > PRD seems to mostly be snipped from the Workstation PRD. I was hoping > > for something with a more original vision I guess. So my first comment > > really is meant to encourage the Fedora Plasma Product to create more > > separation between itself and the Workstation Product. Two products > > with a very similar vision I suspect will be a hard sell generally. > > I agree with this paragraph. > > A product should really have a distinct use case (or cases) that it is > trying to address. Something like 'Fedora media center' or 'Fedora > kiosk' would be an excellent addition to the product lineup. If we take > the workstation specs and just s/G/K/ or s/G/X/, we end up back in the > place we were with spins - too much choice, and too little > differentiation. Well, that's what we have been asked for by many folks and the Plasma idea is exactly there - provide use case driven, not generic product. Even it was/is hard to convince a few folks it's not about s/G/K :). If it's not clear enough from the PRD/MRD, we can clarify it in more details. Jaroslav _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board