Re: Working around the Board's decision on non-free software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Eric H. Christensen  wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Well that didn't take long.  The Desktop WG appears ready to work around the specific wording we used (which was one of my objections) and find a way to include non-free software in searches, now without any kind of notification that the software is non-free[0].  I'm not sure why anyone would think that this isn't a violation of our basic foundations.

[0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-January/008689.html (to include the thread)

Eric,  don't do that.  Don't assume malice unnecessarily.   They are trying to understand the boundaries and they do need some clarification on that.  It is a perfectly reasonable discussion to have.

Rahul
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux