Working around the Board's decision on non-free software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Well that didn't take long.  The Desktop WG appears ready to work around the specific wording we used (which was one of my objections) and find a way to include non-free software in searches, now without any kind of notification that the software is non-free[0].  I'm not sure why anyone would think that this isn't a violation of our basic foundations. 

[0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-January/008689.html (to include the thread)

- -- Eric

- --------------------------------------------------
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Fedora Project

sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - sparks@xxxxxxxxxx
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=YOLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux