Hi
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Put another way, if we're going to make concessions and tell people
how to get said software in our documentation, why would we not make
those same concessions, with the same messaging, in our software where
legally possible?
I understand it but a couple of wiki pages don't serve that case very well. I could setup a redirect now in a couple of minutes and the argument is lost. If you want to argue that point, the MUCH better example is proprietary firmware.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
We clearly have made a concession there and you could argue that we are extending that concession to cover more types of non-free software. I don't necessarily agree but atleast it is a relatively strong argument compared to some random wiki pages.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
We clearly have made a concession there and you could argue that we are extending that concession to cover more types of non-free software. I don't necessarily agree but atleast it is a relatively strong argument compared to some random wiki pages.
Rahul
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board