Re: Proposal: Revision of policy surrounding 3rd party and non-free software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> 
> On 01/22/2014 03:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >Is this really the right level to have this dialogue with the user, though -
> >when they go to install some app?
> >
> >Not to put too tortured of an analogy on it, but if I walk blindly into the
> >restaurant down the street and order the shrimp & grits, having the staff
> >*then* tell me all they serve are vegan shrimp substitute, and why that's so
> >much better for me, my health, the planet, etc.  That may be true.  And it
> >may be a worthwhile conversation to have.  But I think it's probably the
> >wrong place in the interaction to do so.
> 
> So basically the argument here is we are stepping on non-free
> software’ right to existance and our end users choice to use it.
> 
> Back in the day the board rejected that idea and removed codeina
> again what has change?

Well, if I recall, the reasons for dropping codeina included:

- single vendor ecosystem (tied to fluendo)
- it included an upsell to actual money options

While there were likely other reasons too, neither of these specifically
apply here.

Bill
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux