On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 13:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > This is the bit of the movie where the background music turns ominous > and the hero is offered a choice: stick to his principles and tough it > out, or accept the apparently small compromise in one little corner of > his value set which will allow him to spread the rest of that value > set > to the world. Right? > > I think we've all seen how those movies end. I think RPMFusion is the compromise we've already made. > > I would like it on the record that I consider Fedora's current values > - > specifically, our *commitment to* (not just *preference for*) libre > software - an immense social and technical good, I am strongly > committed > to those values, I am strongly opposed to this change (defined as 'any > change which leads to the seamless availability of non-libre software > in > Fedora products'), and I might have to re-consider my work on Fedora > if > this change were to be approved. I feel the same way. (s/might/will/) I'd like to say that this isn't intended as black-mail. We choose distributions because their values resonate with us (most of them provide similar package sets). With such changes, the values of Fedora will no longer resonate with mine. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
