Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Can we get an official fedora position on OpenH264?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> The OpenH264 binary from Cisco does not include a patent license which
> applies to the source. Fedora does not permit the inclusion of binary
> software without source code.
> 
> Thus, the OpenH264 code from Cisco is not acceptable in Fedora.
> 
> Whether it is acceptable for Firefox to download pre-built binary
> software for it to use... well, that decision is up to FESCo, but I
> would imagine that this is functionally equivalent to the Codeina/Codec
> Buddy MP3 situation, where it was decided that Fedora did not want to
> include software that did that.

... and if someone would like FESCo to issue a ruling, someone should open a
ticket so it can be a meeting item.

Bill
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux