Re: Can we get an official fedora position on OpenH264?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If Fedora is not going to implement (or remove) the ability for Firefox
> the ability to download the OpenH264 binary from Cisco, this might affect
> the decision to have H.264 as a mandatory to implement codec for WebRTC.
> It has been suggested that it might help Fedora to comment on the project's
> position on the WebRTC's mailing list, particularly as it is looking more
> likely for H.264 to be mandatory now that Cisco is going to provide a
> binary implementation free of cost when downloaded directly from Cisco.
>
> Several people have stated that Fedora will not allow this, but it would
> be nice to know the official situation and to comment on that to the
> working group.
>
> The thread discussing this is:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/191153.html
>
> The vote on this is coming up this week, so we don't have much time to
> comment.

CC'ing Fedora legal.

josh
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux