On 09/06/2013 03:16 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:17:18PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Today since times have changed I'm at an different place than what
you propose here since I personally have reach the conclusion since
no matter how and which angle I look at it, that ring/product
proposal in it's current form is not fixing anything, it's not
pioneering, it's not revolutionary, it's not "first" anything thus
is not representative solution or direction for the project to take
or the four foundation we have.
I'm very interested in seeing concrete, positive proposals for addressing
the nebulous negatives you've put forth here.
I've already mentioned how I think we should proceed forward and there
is absolutely nothing vague about the negatives that I have been
referring to with the biggest one being the so called "default product"
and certainly not as vague on how and what was actually collected to
come to the conclusion of those three product target groups nor as vague
as where the people that are actually going to be doing all the
necessary work to implement your proposal is coming from. ( and that
question was never answered at flock )
If the plan is to run to RH and have it provide the necessary man power
to implement this then the manager(s) there must have already realized
by now that they might have to increase that manpower by two additional
individuals to the one that would be directly working on it to keep the
balance in the sub-communities.
What I have mentioned here on this thread as the way forward does not
require increase in manpower quite the opposed it should result in
actually less load on existing infrastructure communities...
JBG
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
