On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/13/2012 05:39 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" >> <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/13/2012 01:44 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> Not updating this list [1] ( and the each release list we had previously >>> before them ) affects other distribution migration work since we are trying >>> to reduce duplication of migration efforts between distributions. >> >> I have been updating that list. See the History. > > > Ah you just changed the inprogress to pass I can just as blame that error on > myself since I should probably have put directions on how to modifiy that > page as I did in F15/F16. > > I'll do it for the F18 page Ah, ok. Sounds good. >> I'm confused, which change, a change I made to a package or the >> guidleline change? > > > The changes you made to the submitted units along with suddenly these > guidelines changes being made at similar time. Gotcha. >>> And people should not act all surprised that I'm bit upset after this >>> especially after I found out that I was tagged on some fesco ticket >>> because >>> two individuals got the idea in their head having me bypassing the >>> packaging >>> process which was something that I also was never consulted upon. Then >>> left >>> me standing there on that relevant meeting hanging for something they had >>> started. Even today I still wonder what their end game was with this >>> stunt. >> >> Why would that make you upset with me personally? > > > This had nothing to do with you personally in other sense your actions where > yet another surprise to me. I see. That was not the impression I got from your comments, but it's good to have that cleared up. >> >>> I personally dont think it's to much to ask to be informed about things >>> involving myself or my work within the community from my fellow community >>> members. >> >> I agree completely. You were CCd on the Trac, and included in the >> discussion. > > > I was never included in any discussion before or at the time of the creation > of that ticket. > > I just got cc to it > > The relevant individual should have approached me *before* creating that > ticket and should have been the individuals making their case since after > all this was their ticket. I'm reasonably certain they will in the future, but I can't imagine that the proposal, had it passed, would have gone through without your approval. >> >>> If you haven't figured it out by now I'm not an individual that likes >>> surprises... >> >> That's fine. I'm not big on them myself. But when they happen, as >> they're bound to in any community, we should work together to fix >> things. >> > > Well we can start by fixing our communication errors to prevent these type > of things from happening in the future. Off to a good start, I hope. > There is still alot of work that needs to be done with regards to systemd > which I will gladly accept any help with from your or anybody else from that > matter. > > We have to continue completing the migration process at the same time > working on the previously mentioned unit cleanup process. > > Then it's a question if this [1] should happen at the same time as the > cleanup process since we will be going over the ca 600 components all over > again in it or should be done after the migration process has been completed > ( that is if it gets approved by fesco ). Right, we'll have to see what happens. -J > JBG > > 1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board