On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:17:23PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 06/12/2012 04:34 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >Well there are several aspects of the election process that don't seem > >fair and reasonable to me from general and community perspective so > >let's agree on disagreeing on this topic. > > > >In essence I would think we would want to have the greatest diversity in > >our governing structure otherwise this election will essential still > >just be popularity contest and feel unwelcome ( and with impossible odds > >) to new people that want to participate in it. > > > >I would think it was a fair rule to be able to run for all governing > >body's ( as long as you are not serving in one ) then choose which one > >you will serve should you get elected to more then one and the runner(s) > >up would grab that/those seat(s) that the individual chose to leave behind. > > > >And in addition to the above I feel that we should have a limit on how > >many terms the same individual can serve in the same governing body to > >ensure we always have rotation on new people that bring in fresh > >perspective, fresh approaches and fresh ideas in those governing body's. > > If we consistently had a /lot/ of candidates who were being passed > over by the "popular" ones, maybe you'd have an argument. Given that > we're seeing a struggle to get /anybody/ to fill the open seats and > are often voting where there is 1 extra candidate beyond seats to > fill I really don't thing adding any additional barriers to those > seats is going to improve matters. > I can see his point with FESCo, actually. But I don't know that the changes proposed here would "fix" it. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp90Sh7tAXkH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
