On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:39:56 -0500 > Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > On 2/6/12 2:30 PM, seth vidal wrote: >> > >On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:20:25 -0800 >> > >Jesse Keating<jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > >> > >>On 2/6/12 8:42 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > >>>So another question to be considered is whether github provides a >> > >>>service that isn't available from other, open source >> > >>>third-parties. >> > >> >> > >>gitorious being the closest open source alternative. >> > >> >> > > >> > >What about gitlabhq? >> > >> > Looks like it was started in 2011, which was after I did any looking >> > into this market :) >> >> I may be blind, but it also doesn't look like gitlabhq is actually >> offering hosting/a service - they'll give you the code so you can >> host your own. >> > > correct they don't - however we may have the capacity to host that in > FI. Argh. Why? We already have fedorahosted.org which hosts git trees. We also have fedorapeople.org, which can easily host git trees per user. I don't see the need to host ANOTHER git tree hosting thing at all. josh _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
