On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I agree. It would be nice if it was a easy to find link, well indexed > and not in the wiki burried. ;) > Suggestion: if the Board agrees, file a ticket with websites to add it. Great, I think this could be dealed at the next Board's meeting if they're fine with it. > > 2. any Fedora contributor before starting his/her contributions > > should be prompt to accept the CoC like we currently do with the > > FPCA, I am pretty much sure not everyone out there ever saw the page > > at [1]. > > We could do this if the Board would like, but personally I am against > having people agree to it. Its not an agreement. I do agree that > displaying a link to it and asking the user to read it would be good. > This was suggested when it was setup, but we never got around to it. ;( > > Suggestion: If the Board agrees, file a ticket with the fas project to > add a link to the document. Same as above. > >3. as I outlined above punishing someone is not the way go, > > anyway I think taking in front of the Board any of the borderline > > cases should be a must. (i.e if a contributor breaks the rules > > several times and gets warned, an action must be taken to avoid the > > repetition of further infringements) > > Yeah, and the above enforcement document does suggest this. If you > cannot solve the problem yourself, and you cannot get it solved in the > group/sig where it's happening, then the next step is the Board. Thanks for the useful link Kevin. cheers, Andrea
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
