On Aug 1, 2011, at 3:37 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > There is no approval (Board or otherwise) needed for virt images based > on Spot's email earlier and the Trademark guidelines. > Moreover, in practice, companies are routinely creating > templates/images of Fedora instances without oversight or any more > permission than what the trademark guidelines provide. So if it's > easier for us to generate a different LiveCD ISO than a virt > image/template for EC2 then why do we make the process for Spins so > onerous? I didn't claim that approval was needed. I was trying to shed some light as to why some felt that there /should/ be approval. I'm not entirely sure what you're asking here. My whole point earlier is that cloud image creation is different than say a LiveCD compose, or just re-hosting the lived that we the project created and published. There are also cases of 3rd parties getting it wrong. I believe vmware has a current bug where their "easy install" template for Fedora will try to create a rather small /boot partition, one that is too small for the kernel install. End result? People thing Fedora is broken. Call it paranoia, call it perfectionism, call it whatever you want. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
