Re: Fedora website, Red Hat, copyright notices and FPCA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 18:02, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 07:40 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
>> Is your concern that the MIT license doesn't actually appear at the
>> top of the spec file?
>
> Yes.   I would prefer this
>

Why? I am not sure what having 2 to 22 lines included in every RPM is
going to accomplish in the large frame of things?


>> I guess this is a Fedora Packaging issue, but could one automate the
>> inclusion of an MIT license notice in spec files?
>
> Possibly.  I believe openSUSE has automated this or they are copying the
> same exact boiler plate notice over and over again which is not unusual
> for spec files

Looking over the MIT License I am not sure it would improve anything
beyond causing more confusion:

# Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
# obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files
# (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction,
# including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge,
# publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software,
# and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so,
# subject to the following conditions:
#
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
# included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
#
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
# EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
# MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
# NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
# BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
# ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
# CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
# SOFTWARE.
#

Would it need to be rewritten to say that it only covers the SPEC file
and not the associated software because my not a lawyer just a coder
reading of the license would make me assume it means everything in the
software I just downloaded.

> Rahul
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux