On 06/29/2011 08:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Right. I'm not arguing with you that the FPCA does not cover this. I'm > asking, do we want to move away from relying on good faith (current > practice) to forcing maintainers to hunt down license information when they > do this? Nope. I am only suggesting explicit licensing as a alternative where we rely on FPCA default license now. If we are relying on good faith in other cases, we can continuing doing that with the recommendation (not a mandate) to consider explicit licensing whenever possible. Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
