On 06/28/2011 07:30 AM, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> This isn't a purely legal matter but also a matter >> of policy since it is in the best interest of Fedora ( but not >> necessarily Red Hat Legal's concern) to lower the barrier to entries to >> Fedora whenever possible. > While I agree with this, I don't think that the FPCA presents a large > barrier to entry today. Large or not, any legal text is certainly a additional barrier. it isn't possible to deny that. Sometimes the additional barrier is justified and in other cases not. Here is a question for you. If Fedora design team accepted any contributions licensed under CC-BY-SA and dropped the necessity of FPCA and the warning at the top of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_connect_to_the_design_team_sparkleshare Do you honestly believe that we will lower the barrier to entry or not? I would submit that this is indeed the case and FPCA serves no purpose here. Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
