On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:31:10PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:26:09 -0400, > Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > > A number of people caught an issue in the eligibility configuration > > > for voters in the Board Election. Per the Board's Succession > > > Planning[1] document this election is open to any person in the Fedora > > > Accounts System who has completed the CLA. > > > > Just a nonsubstantive issue of terminology: there is no more CLA. We > > should not refer to the FPCA as a "CLA" since that would be inaccurate. :) > > Yes and no. This was referring to specific groups that people are in and > the specific groups are cla_fedora and cla_done. There is a group > cla_fpca, but we aren't ready to use it for this election. (I'm not sure > if cla_fpca is intended to just handle the transition or if it was intended to > replace cla_done.) Ah, I see. OK. - RF _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
