On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:26:09 -0400, Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:23:59PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > A number of people caught an issue in the eligibility configuration > > for voters in the Board Election. Per the Board's Succession > > Planning[1] document this election is open to any person in the Fedora > > Accounts System who has completed the CLA. > > Just a nonsubstantive issue of terminology: there is no more CLA. We > should not refer to the FPCA as a "CLA" since that would be inaccurate. :) Yes and no. This was referring to specific groups that people are in and the specific groups are cla_fedora and cla_done. There is a group cla_fpca, but we aren't ready to use it for this election. (I'm not sure if cla_fpca is intended to just handle the transition or if it was intended to replace cla_done.) It may be that eventually the names of these groups should be changed, but that should be done carefully, so as not to break things that have the old names hardwired. _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
