Re: Seeking feedback and/or approval on CWG working group drafts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 19:19, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With all due respect asking the board to handle death penalty cases
> isn't asking the board to be traffic cops. It is a show of respect to
> the board that I trust them more than any other body to put personal
> feelings aside for the good of the project. They more than anyone else
> have that responsibility in my mind.


Death penalty is quite the loaded term. If the board says to Joe Bob
Contributor that they are no longer welcome at Fedora related events,
projects, mailing lists, etc. it is no where the same as we putting
him on a firing line and shooting him. Putting it in such terms does
nothing to further the conversation and just sets people's opinions in
stone before a conversation can be started.






-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux