On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 20:40 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > >> == Community Working Group == >> >> If involved parties feel the decision of the moderators/channel >> operators were unfair or biased, they can raise the issue to the >> Community working group. The CWG may appoint a mediator or decide >> directly on the issue themselves. >> >> Some things to try/consider: >> >> * If you bring an issue to the CWG, they may not decide the issue >> in your favor. Be understanding of any decisions made. >> * Handling of the issue could be reviewed and feedback for >> moderators/mailing lists managers provided. This may result in >> changes to policy, so be aware if you bring it up you may change >> things for the area you are working in. >> * Final decision takes place here. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > _Final_ decision takes place at the CWG? > > How is the CWG appointed/elected? How long are they granted seats? For the moment, it seems like it's one of those "serves at the pleasure of the FPL/Board" kind of things. > If the CWG decides against someone are they, then, OUT of fedora? Is > it an excommunication? A Censure? I'm assuimg that the "enforcement" draft *purposefully* stops short of talking about "removal from the community". Which is probably a good idea if the attempt is to get general agreement on a nice starting point for both documents, which could later be built into something more, if the CWG chose to do so. Or maybe I simply assume too much. :P --Max _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
