Re: Looking for feedback on Fedora COC Enforcement Draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 20:40 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:

> == Community Working Group ==
> 
> If involved parties feel the decision of the moderators/channel
> operators were unfair or biased, they can raise the issue to the
> Community working group. The CWG may appoint a mediator or decide
> directly on the issue themselves.
> 
> Some things to try/consider:
> 
>       * If you bring an issue to the CWG, they may not decide the issue
>         in your favor. Be understanding of any decisions made. 
>       * Handling of the issue could be reviewed and feedback for
>         moderators/mailing lists managers provided. This may result in
>         changes to policy, so be aware if you bring it up you may change
>         things for the area you are working in. 
>       * Final decision takes place here. 
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

_Final_ decision takes place at the CWG?

How is the CWG appointed/elected? How long are they granted seats? 

If the CWG decides against someone are they, then, OUT of fedora? Is it
an excommunication? A Censure? 

-sv


_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux