On 02/22/2011 01:41 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > On 02/22/2011 03:24 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> Going through the governance documents which are generally sound except >> for this part [1]. >> >> * Appoint or remove members of itself >> * Chooses its own method of adding and removing members >> >> This has the potential affect to be misused and effectively takes any >> kind of community involvement out of the picture. > Do realize that this document, in general, is more about trying to > define and characterize the status quo. No I did not realize that I took "proposed governance documents" as something that was being worked towards not something that already had come to be but was being better defined and charactarized. > And, to my own thinking, that > statement is fairly accurate. Do you disagree? > > Further, I'd suggest that if you don't like this particular item as > worded, please do provide constructive suggestions on how to make it better. ? I think this is some kind of communication breakdown. I don't know how you came to the conclusions that I thought it was inaccurate, was disagreeing and thought it was badly worded. What I pointed out was cons to implementing this and was simply looking for dialog of the pros for doing so basically the discussion regarding both of the items I pointed out, the argument with implementing this and against it simply for the reason that I would not repeat something that already been discussed. JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
