Am Samstag, den 15.01.2011, 16:10 -0600 schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:51:07 +0100, > Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > "Must have an approved test plan on file with the Fedora Quality > > Assurance team > > Test plan should be written involving members of the QA team > > Test plan must be executed by someone, with review by a member of the QA > > team. NB: this requires at least 2 people to participate in the testing. > > The above must be in place in sufficient time to allow testing, and > > remediation of uncovered issues, to occur" > > > > *None* of this was is part of the spins process. > > We were working on making this happen in what was left of the Spins SIG. I know that the spins SIG is not in a good shape and I'm happy to help, but the current meeting time does not work out for me. > > *None* of the media we ship ATM is in that tree, see > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=correspondingsource.git;a=tree;f=srpmlists;hb=HEAD > > This probably happened because of lost knowledge in the spins SIG. It wasn't > documented where I knew to look and I didn't know about it. This is probably > something that should be documented in the Spins SIG process documentation > if we want to keep doing this going forward. I have picked up your ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/ticket/45 and started committing the missing srpmlists. I will continue tomorrow when I'm home and have reliable internet access again. I have also added the srpmlist requirement and info how to generate them to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process Please tell me if it works for you. Regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
