On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:21 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I think there's an interesting difference here in that Fedora's > > 'desktop' team is almost entirely composed of people who are significant > > upstream GNOME developers. The other desktop teams are not. Fedora's KDE > > packagers are not core KDE developers (some are contributors, but not > > all, and not to the extent of the 'desktop' team), Xfce packagers are > > not core Xfce developers, LXDE packagers are not core LXDE developers. > > I'd expect to see upstream development happening transparently on an > upstream list. Perhaps this is what we're looking for? > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list Indeed - I'm subscribed to those lists, personally. But that's kinda the point: Fedora and upstream development, for GNOME, are blurred to the point that you may as well just subscribe to the upstream lists. :) It's not necessarily a bad thing, as I said, but it's different. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
