On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:15:28AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 10/21/10 6:12 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > As I already said to Jesse: It seems the board is setting way higher > > standards for testing or QA and has way more concerns for artwork or > > infrastructure than for any other spin that was ever approved. To me and > > many other ambassadors this looks as if the board is trying to > > anticipate our volunteer work. > > Completely incorrect. > > A) Every other spin has to be proposed and approved prior to the Feature > Freeze of a release. We're well past that for this. > > B) This is not a normal spin. Normal spins are generated by well > understood tools already in the Fedora distribution with established > usage knowledge, and are produced nightly for testing, and at each > milestone. This is not. It seems to me this isn't the first time people have felt the need to turn away a very late-breaking change, even though everyone's got all the best intentions in trying to do something cool. Can we use this as an opportunity to figure out what we as a project could do better, in terms of our schedule, to let contributors know points after which changes (beyond packages or features) should be deferred to the next release? I know we have schedules for spins, rel-eng, and development, but what could we do better to make sure groups like Ambassadors are aware of them and not laboring hard at the last minute only to be told "no"? Perhaps we should add specific schedule items to the Ambassadors schedule? Or is it more appropriate to ask that changes like this be worked through on specific topical lists like rel-eng or devel? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
